I came across an interesting article that is not necessarily genealogy related, but it is related to guessing age. I thought it interesting and thought I would share my version of the information.
This year, Spotify’s annual wrap-up “Spotify Wrapped” rolled out a new metric called “Listening Age.” Instead of reflecting how many birthdays you’ve actually celebrated, this number is a playful approximation of “how old your taste in music is.”
Here’s how it works (according to Spotify itself):
1. They look at the release dates of *all* the songs you
listened to during the year.
2. They find the five-year span of music during which your
listening diverged significantly from others in your age group — i.e., music
you engaged with *more than people your age on average.
3. Then they map that period to a hypothetical “reminiscence
bump” — assuming you would’ve been 16–21 years old when those songs originally
came out.
4. Finally, they reverse-engineer a “current age” based on
that assumption. For instance: if your most-listened period was the late 1970s,
Spotify might peg you at around 63 today — because that would correspond to
someone who was a teen back then.
So if your Wrapped claims you're 73, that suggests your top
listening window was music from roughly 1960s–70s — in other words, Spotify’s
saying your musical soul was hanging out with baby-boomers.
Why it feels weird — and why it’s funny
Unsurprisingly, the “Listening Age” has sent many users into
fits of laughter, confusion, or light existential dread. For young listeners
(teens, 20-somethings), getting a 70s-style age often feels hilariously off —
yet somehow… right for their retro-leaning playlist. Social media is full of
memes and jokes about being musical “grandparents” overnight.
Similarly, older folks sometimes find themselves
surprisingly young — a 60-year-old user might have a listening age of 21 if
they mostly played music from the 2010s.
For many, the absurd mismatch between actual age and
Listening Age becomes the point: it’s a cheeky reflection of how eclectic and
intergenerational streaming tastes can be — not a serious estimate of your
birth year.
What the “Listening Age” is really for
It seems the feature isn’t meant as serious analytics — but
more as a **conversation starter**. It leverages nostalgia, generational
identity, and the element of surprise to get people talking (and sharing). The
psychological concept behind it — known as the “reminiscence bump” and suggests
that many of us feel most connected to music from our teenage/young-adult
years. Spotify simply flips that insight into a playful “age-measuring” tool
based on your listening data.
Wrapped has long been part scoreboard, part social ritual —
and Listening Age adds a quirky twist to that. As one writer put it: sometimes,
the fun is in being a 73-year-old 23-year-old.
Should you take it seriously?
Probably not. Because:
·
The age is based on listening habits, not real
age.
·
It assumes your most-listened music era matches
when you were 16–21 — which may not reflect reality, especially if you’re
browsing across decades or sharing an account.
·
It’s as much a marketing / social-sharing
feature as a music-taste gauge — built for fun, surprise, and conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment