Monday, June 1, 2026

Flag Day – 14 June 2024

Flag Day – 14 June 2024


Flag Day is celebrated on June 14th to commemorate the adoption of the flag of the United States on June 14th 1777 by resolution of the Second Continental Congress, in the midst of the Revolutionary War.

Colonial troops fought under many different flags with various symbols—rattlesnakes, pine trees, and eagles—and slogans—”Don’t Tread on Me,” “Liberty or Death,” and “Conquer or Die,” to name a few.

The origins of the Stars and Stripes have become part of American folklore. Although many people believe that Betsy Ross designed the first flag, there is no true proof of this. However, records do indicate that she made ensigns and pennants for the Philadelphia navy during the war.

Some historians credit Francis Hopkinson as the designer of the American flag. A congressman from New Jersey, Hopkinson was a patriot, lawyer, poet, artist, and signer of the Declaration of Independence.

American Eagle Day

 American Eagle Day - 20 June 2024 


American Eagle Day is observed annually on June 20 to commemorate a pivotal moment in American history: the day in 1782 when the bald eagle was officially adopted as our national symbol on the Great Seal of the United States. This special observance celebrates not only the eagle's symbolic significance but also its remarkable recovery from near-extinction and the enduring American values it represents.

A Historic Designation

On June 20, 1782, the Continental Congress approved Charles Thomson's design for the Great Seal of the United States, featuring the American bald eagle as its centerpiece. After six years and three unsuccessful committee attempts beginning on July 4, 1776, Thomson, the secretary of the Continental Congress, worked with Philadelphia lawyer William Barton to create the final design, which was submitted and accepted on the same day.

The seal depicts a bald eagle clutching an olive branch in its right talon and arrows in its left, with the bird's breast displaying a shield marked with thirteen vertical red and white stripes topped by a bar of blue. The olive branch represents peace, the arrows symbolize war, and the eagle faces the olive branch to demonstrate America's preference for peaceful resolution.

From Endangerment to Recovery: A Conservation Triumph

The bald eagle's journey from the brink of extinction to thriving populations stands as one of America's greatest conservation success stories. By the 1950s, the bald eagle faced serious risk of extinction due to habitat loss, hunting, and pesticides that damaged their eggs, leading to its classification as endangered in 1967.

On July 12, 1995, the species was removed from the U.S. Federal Government's List of Endangered Species and transferred to the List of Threatened Species. By June 2007, as populations continued to thrive, the American bald eagle was withdrawn from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in the Lower 48 States. Today, scientists estimate there are over 300,000 bald eagles thriving across the country.

The Birth of American Eagle Day

In 1995, at the request of the American Eagle Foundation, President Bill Clinton and Tennessee Governor Don Sundquist each proclaimed the first American Eagle Day. This grassroots effort gained remarkable momentum across the nation.

Since then, Governors from a combined total of 49 states have signed Proclamations or Letters of Recognition designating June 20 as American Eagle Day in their respective states. In April 2007, the United States Senate passed the first American Eagle Day resolution by unanimous consent, followed in June by the U.S. House of Representatives also passing their first resolution designating June 20, 2007 as American Eagle Day.

A Symbol of American Values

The American Eagle Foundation sponsors National American Eagle Day to raise awareness about the American Eagle, its habitats, and conservation efforts. The observance serves multiple purposes: honoring our national symbol, celebrating the species' physical recovery, educating the public about ongoing conservation needs, and reflecting on the American ideals of freedom, strength, and resilience that the majestic bird represents.

The bald eagle, with its white head (the term "bald" derives from an older meaning of "white-headed"), powerful wingspan of up to seven feet, and ability to spot prey from miles away, continues to inspire Americans and symbolize the nation's enduring spirit.

This June 20, take a moment to appreciate this magnificent bird and consider supporting conservation efforts that ensure future generations will witness bald eagles soaring through American skies.

Learn More:

·         American Eagle Foundation: https://eagles.org/take-action/aboutaed/

·         National Day Calendar: https://www.nationaldaycalendar.com/national-day/national-american-eagle-day-june-20

·         U.S. History: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/june-20/congress-adopts-the-great-seal-of-the-united-states

·         ShareAmerica: https://share.america.gov/its-official-bald-eagle-americas-national-bird/


Army Birthday - Friday, 14 June 2026

Every June 14, Americans commemorate the birth of the United States Army, one of the nation's oldest and most storied institutions. This date marks the anniversary of when the Second Continental Congress, meeting in present-day Independence Hall in Philadelphia, voted to establish the Continental Army to provide for the common defense of the colonies on June 14, 1775.


Older Than the Nation It Defends

On April 19, 1775, the Revolutionary War began when British troops fired on colonial militiamen at Lexington, Massachusetts, transforming what had been a civil disturbance into open warfare. As fellow citizen soldiers from New Hampshire, Connecticut and Rhode Island responded to the alarm, a force of New Englanders surrounded Boston and had the British troops who occupied it under siege, called the Army of Observation.

The colonies needed a force of professional soldiers who were trained, funded and equipped for extended military maneuvers. On June 14, 1775, in a momentous act of unity and resolve, the Congress passed a resolution to formally establish the instrument of national defense in the form of the Continental Army: "Resolved, that six companies of expert riflemen, be immediately raised in Pennsylvania, two in Maryland, and two in Virginia".

On June 15, 1775, Congress unanimously elected George Washington commander-in-chief of the Continental Army. On July 3, 1775, he took charge of his Army in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Remarkably, the United States Declaration of Independence would not be enacted until July 4, 1776—making the American Army older than the country it serves.

The Birth of American Infantry

The Continental Congress created a "Corps of Riflemen" to act as skirmishers and light infantry to scout and screen in front of the main army in the field, ensuring that the first troops in the American Army were Infantry Soldiers. The first men to enlist came from Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. These riflemen brought their own handmade weapons and wore hunting clothes, marking the beginning of a tradition of American military excellence.

From 1775 until the Revolutionary War's end in 1783, over 231,000 men served in the Continental Army, with upwards of 145,000 additional men serving in colonial militias that fought alongside the Army. The Continentals endured tremendous hardships including the harsh winter encampments at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, and Morristown, New Jersey.

251 Years of Service

The year 2026 marks the 251st birthday of the U.S. Army. Last year's 250th anniversary was a historic milestone. President Donald J. Trump issued a proclamation on June 13, 2025, declaring June 14, 2025, as a day in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States Army. A grand military parade and celebration took place on June 14, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., marking the first major military parade in Washington since the 1991 National Victory Celebration.

How Army Birthday Is Observed

Army Birthday is not a federal holiday, so businesses and schools remain open as usual. However, Army installations and military communities across the country and around the world typically mark the occasion with special ceremonies and celebrations.

Traditional celebrations include:

Army Birthday Ball: Many installations host formal black-tie events where attendees honor fallen soldiers, welcome new recruits, and celebrate the Army's heritage. These events typically feature ceremonial traditions, guest speakers, and a reading of the Army's history.

Commemoration Ceremonies: Military bases organize special events featuring color guards, historical reenactments, and recognition of soldiers' achievements throughout the year.

Community Gatherings: Army families often gather for celebratory lunches, dinners, and activities that strengthen bonds within the military community.

Ways to Honor the Army's Birthday

You can participate in honoring the U.S. Army and supporting veterans in meaningful ways:

Volunteer at VA Medical Centers: The Veterans Health Administration operates 170 VA Medical Centers and 1,193 outpatient clinics across the United States, providing care to over 9 million enrolled Veterans. Contact your local VA facility to learn about volunteer opportunities.

Visit Military Memorials: Pay your respects at military monuments and memorials. Notable sites include the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C., and the National Memorial Arch at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania—where Continental Army soldiers endured one of their greatest trials.

Support Troops Through Care Packages: Organizations like the USO provide services and amenities for service members. You can send care packages containing snacks, toiletries, stationery, and nonperishable items to deployed soldiers through USO centers and other military support organizations.

Learn and Share: Take time to learn about Army history and share stories of service with younger generations. Understanding the sacrifices made by soldiers throughout our nation's history helps ensure their legacy endures.

This We'll Defend

The U.S. Army's motto, "This We'll Defend," captures the enduring commitment of American soldiers to protect the nation and uphold its values. From the riflemen who marched to Boston in 1775 to today's modern force, the Army has remained true to this promise for 251 years.

On June 14, take a moment to recognize the soldiers, veterans, and families who have contributed to this remarkable legacy of service.

Learn More:

·         U.S. Army Official Site: https://www.army.mil/

·         U.S. Army 250th Birthday: https://www.army.mil/1775/

·         U.S. Army Center of Military History: https://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/birth.html

·         Veterans Health Administration: https://www.va.gov/health/

·         Find VA Locations: https://www.va.gov/find-locations

The Committee of Five: How a "Silent Member" Became America's Voice

May be an image of 1 person and text June 11, 1776 - In the sweltering heat of a Philadelphia summer, the Continental Congress made a decision that would echo through centuries. Just days after Virginia's Richard Henry Lee boldly introduced his resolution calling for American independence from Great Britain, Congress appointed five men to transform revolutionary sentiment into immortal words. They could not have known that their choice of principal author would prove to be, as one historian later noted, "an inspired choice."

A Continental Coalition

The Committee of Five was deliberately constructed to represent the geographic and political spectrum of the rebellious colonies. From New England came the formidable intellect of John Adams of Massachusetts and the steady hand of Roger Sherman of Connecticut. The Middle Colonies contributed the legendary Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania—scientist, diplomat, and philosopher—alongside Robert Livingston of New York. Representing the South was Virginia's Thomas Jefferson, at just 33 years old the youngest member of the committee.

The Unlikely Author

On paper, the choice of primary drafter seemed obvious. Benjamin Franklin's international reputation as a Renaissance man was unmatched. John Adams had been a fierce, vocal champion of independence, his passionate speeches stirring Congress toward decisive action. Yet the committee chose neither of these titans.

Instead, they selected Thomas Jefferson—a man so reticent in congressional debates that he was known as a "silent member." It was a decision that puzzled contemporaries and intrigued future generations.

Adams Explains the Choice

Four and a half decades later, in 1822, an 87-year-old John Adams finally revealed the reasoning behind this momentous decision in a letter to Timothy Pickering. His recollection provides a fascinating window into both the political calculations and personal dynamics that shaped America's founding document.

Adams explained that strategic considerations played a crucial role: "It was the Frankfort advice, to place a Virginian at the head of everything." Virginia, the largest and most influential colony, needed to be seen leading the independence movement to ensure broad colonial support.

But there was more to it than political strategy. Adams had been captivated by Jefferson's talents from the moment the young Virginian arrived at Congress in June 1775. "He brought with him a reputation for literature, science, and a happy talent of composition," Adams recalled. "Writings of his were handed about, remarkable for the peculiar felicity of expression."

Despite his silence during congressional debates, Jefferson revealed himself to be "so prompt, frank, explicit, and decisive upon committees and in conversation" that he quickly won Adams's respect and affection. "He soon seized upon my heart," Adams confessed.

The Famous Conversation

Adams's letter preserves one of the most remarkable exchanges in American history—the conversation between him and Jefferson when the subcommittee met to determine who would draft the Declaration:

Jefferson: "You should do it."

Adams: "Oh! no."

Jefferson: "Why will you not? You ought to do it."

Adams: "I will not."

Jefferson: "Why?"

Adams: "Reasons enough."

Adams then laid out his case with characteristic bluntness: "Reason first—You are a Virginian, and a Virginian ought to appear at the head of this business. Reason second—I am obnoxious, suspected, and unpopular. You are much otherwise. Reason third—You can write ten times better than I can."

Jefferson's response was simple and humble: "Well, if you are decided, I will do as well as I can."

Jefferson's Solitary Labor

True to his word, Jefferson set to work. With minimal input from his fellow committee members, he crafted the document that would define American principles for generations to come. When the draft was presented to Congress, it bore Jefferson's handwriting—the physical manifestation of one man's extraordinary ability to capture the aspirations of millions.

The "silent member" had found his voice, and in doing so, had given voice to a nation.

The selection of Thomas Jefferson to draft the Declaration of Independence reminds us that leadership takes many forms. Sometimes the quietest voice in the room has the most powerful words to share—words that, once written, will never be silenced.


When Soldiers Came to Dinner: The Quartering Acts and the Road to Revolution

A Lesson Britain Refused to Learn
British Troops Land in Boston 1768

Imagine opening your door to find British soldiers demanding you feed them, house them, and provide them with firewood and candles, all at your own expense. Now imagine this happening not once, but twice, with the second time being even more invasive than the first. This was the reality American colonists faced under the Quartering Acts, a pair of laws that would help ignite a revolution.

The British seemed incapable of learning from their mistakes. After the Quartering Act of 1765 generated fierce colonial resistance, Parliament inexplicably doubled down, passing an even harsher version on June 2, 1774, as part of the infamous Intolerable Acts. Rather than calming tensions, this legislative stubbornness became yet another factor unifying the fractious colonies against British rule.

The First Quartering Act: Setting the Stage for Conflict

On May 15, 1765, the first Quartering Act received royal assent, requiring colonial authorities to arrange for British troops to be housed in local barracks and public houses, and if numbers required, in uninhabited houses, outhouses, barns, or other buildings. Contrary to popular myth, the act did not allow the British government to house soldiers in occupied private homes—this was specifically prohibited.

Nevertheless, colonists were furious. The Quartering Act required colonial authorities to provide food, drink, quarters, fuel, and transportation to British forces stationed in their towns or villages. The financial burden fell squarely on colonial legislatures and, by extension, colonial taxpayers.

When 1,500 British troops arrived at New York City in 1766, the New York Provincial Assembly refused to comply with the Quartering Act and did not supply billeting for the troops, forcing the soldiers to remain on their ships. For failure to comply with the Quartering Act, Parliament suspended the Province of New York's Governor and legislature in 1767 and 1769. All other colonies, with the exception of Pennsylvania, refused to comply with the Quartering Act.

Why Colonists Saw Red

The colonial fury stemmed from several deep-seated concerns. First, there was the fundamental question: Why was a standing army needed after the French had been defeated in battle? The French and Indian War had ended, yet British troops remained—not on the frontier protecting settlers, but in cities like Boston and New York, seemingly positioned to intimidate the colonial population.

Second, colonists harbored a traditional fear of standing armies, viewing them as instruments of tyranny rather than protection. The presence of idle soldiers in peacetime contradicted everything colonists understood about English liberty.

Third, and perhaps most galling, was the matter of taxation without representation. Troop financing had been exercised for 150 years by representative provincial assemblies rather than by the Parliament in London. The Quartering Act represented Parliament's assertion of authority over the colonies in disregard of this established practice.

John Dickinson, in his widely circulated pamphlet, captured the colonial position with precision: "If the British Parliament has a legal authority to issue an order that we shall furnish a single article for the troops here and compel obedience to that order, they have the same right to issue an order for us supply those troops with arms, clothes, and every necessary... How is this mode more tolerable than the Stamp Act?"

The Manufactory House: A Boston Case Study

Boston was already a hotbed of revolutionary activity when British soldiers needed housing; Bostonians were not very forthcoming in finding a place for them to stay. The governor decided that a solution would be to evict residents from the Manufactory House, a public building owned by Massachusetts but rented by private residents, and turn it into a barracks.

This was technically legal, but Bostonians found it profoundly unjust. Relationships between British soldiers and colonial civilians were often tense and occasionally boiled over into violence, especially in Boston. The Manufactory House incident exemplified how the quartering issue created real, dangerous tensions in colonial cities.

1774: Britain Makes the Same Mistake—Only Worse

You would think that after nearly a decade of colonial resistance and the spectacular failure of the first Quartering Act, British officials might reconsider their approach. Instead, following the Boston Tea Party in December 1773, Parliament enacted the Coercive Acts (quickly renamed the "Intolerable Acts" by outraged colonists). Among these punitive measures was a new Quartering Act, passed June 2, 1774.

The 1774 Act acknowledged upfront that "doubts have been entertained whether troops can be quartered otherwise than in barracks" and gave royal governors the right to use "uninhabited houses, outhouses, barns, or other buildings" to quarter soldiers. The critical change: this new act allowed royal governors, rather than colonial legislatures, to find homes and buildings to quarter British soldiers.

This transferred power from elected colonial assemblies to royally appointed governors—a direct assault on colonial self-government. The Quartering Act was especially reviled as it applied not just to rebellious Boston or Massachusetts but to all of the American colonies.

While the British Quartering Acts had attempted to protect the rights of colonial Americans, the Quartering Act of 1774 paired with the other Coercive Acts went too far in the eyes of American colonists, and the relationship soon soured beyond repair.

From Grievance to Constitutional Protection

The impact of the Quartering Acts extended far beyond the 1770s. When the Continental Congress drafted the Declaration of Independence in 1776, quartering made the list of grievances. The Declaration explicitly noted: "He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us".

Even more tellingly, when Americans drafted their Bill of Rights after winning independence, they ensured this particular abuse could never happen again. The Third Amendment states clearly:

"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."

Resentment over the quartering practice is reflected in the Third Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which forbids it in peacetime. While modern Americans rarely think about this amendment, it stands as a permanent reminder of colonial grievances and the principle that government cannot commandeer private property without consent.

The Broader Lesson

The story of the Quartering Acts illustrates a critical failure of British imperial policy. Rather than addressing colonial concerns after the 1765 Act proved unworkable and unpopular, Parliament imposed an even more restrictive version in 1774. This pattern—responding to colonial resistance with greater assertion of parliamentary authority—characterized British policy throughout the pre-Revolutionary period.

The response to these acts helped galvanize colonial unity against British rule, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of the American Revolution in 1775 and the subsequent declaration of independence in 1776. What began as a practical question about housing soldiers evolved into a fundamental constitutional crisis about the limits of governmental power.

The Quartering Acts demonstrate how seemingly mundane administrative matters—where soldiers sleep, who pays for their meals—can become flashpoints when they embody larger questions about rights, representation, and respect. Britain's inability to learn from the failure of the 1765 Act, instead choosing to pass an even more objectionable version in 1774, reveals the institutional blindness that would cost them an empire.

Ironically, the 1774 Quartering Act was set to expire on March 24, 1776—just months after the Revolution had already begun.

Sources:

1.       Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation: https://www.jyfmuseums.org/learn/teacher-resources-programs/classroom-resources/the-quartering-acts

2.       Wikipedia - Quartering Acts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartering_Acts

3.       AmericanRevolution.org - Quartering Acts of 1765 and 1774: https://www.americanrevolution.org/quartering-acts/

4.       American Battlefield Trust - The Quartering Act: https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/quartering-act

5.       EBSCO Research - Quartering Act: https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/quartering-act

6.       Britannica - Quartering Act: https://www.britannica.com/event/Quartering-Act

7.       U.S. History - Quartering Act (1765): https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h641.html



The Art of the Letter: Samuel Richardson and 18th-Century Correspondence


In an era before telephones, emails, or text messages, the written letter served as the lifeline of 18th-century communication. These carefully crafted missives were far more than simple messages—they were windows into the soul, vehicles for moral instruction, and essential tools for navigating social relationships. No figure better exemplifies the profound importance of letter-writing during this period than Samuel Richardson, whose influence extended from the printing press to the pages of literary history.

The Letter as Essential Communication

During the 18th century, letters were indispensable. They maintained family connections across distances, facilitated business transactions, preserved friendships, and even served courtship purposes. The ability to write an effective letter was considered a crucial skill for anyone hoping to succeed in society. Letters were often shared among family members and friends, creating semi-public documents that required careful attention to both substance and style.

Samuel Richardson: Master of the Epistolary Form

Samuel Richardson (baptized August 19, 1689—died July 4, 1761) revolutionized both letter-writing instruction and the English novel through his innovative use of the epistolary form. Despite not publishing his first novel until after turning 50, Richardson's literary career began in his youth as what contemporaries called a "precocious letter-writer," developing further during the 1720s after he launched his London printing business.

Richardson's genius lay in recognizing that letters could capture "continual flux as living experience"—the immediacy and authenticity of moments as they unfold. His letter-writing style was characterized by its "plain and unadorned nature," reflecting what he called "the natural and easy beauties of the pen." This approach prioritized genuine expression over ornate flourishes, making his guidance accessible to ordinary readers seeking to improve their correspondence skills.

Literary Innovation Through Letters

Richardson's three major novels transformed the epistolary form into high art:

·         Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded (1740) became a publishing sensation, telling the story of a young servant resisting seduction entirely through letters

·         Clarissa; or, The History of a Young Lady (1747–48), considered one of the greatest English tragic novels, exploited letters' capacity for theatrical presentation and psychological depth

·         The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753–54) continued his exploration of character through correspondence

These "experimental 'histories'" allowed Richardson to present characters "struggling under the pressure of momentary perceptions," creating an intimacy and immediacy impossible with traditional narrative techniques. By eliminating the omniscient narrator in favor of individual voices, Richardson's epistolary novels depended entirely on the authenticity of his characters' letters to tell their stories.

Richardson's Practical Guide to Letter-Writing

Beyond fiction, Richardson made his most direct contribution to 18th-century correspondence with his instructional manual: Letters Written to and for Particular Friends, on the Most Important Occasions (1750). This comprehensive guide contained 173 model letters, offering not merely "the requisite style and forms to be observed in writing familiar letters; but how to think and act justly and prudently, in the common concerns of human life."

This remarkable work is available for download at: https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_letters-written-to-and-f_richardson-samuel_1750


The manual served multiple purposes: teaching proper epistolary format, providing moral guidance, and demonstrating how to navigate complex social situations through written correspondence. It exemplified Richardson's belief that letter-writing was both an art and a tool for ethical living.

A Turning Point in Literary Culture

Richardson's correspondence practices marked a pivotal transition in 18th-century culture. He was highly conscious of letters existing on "a spectrum of publicity" and deliberately constructed his letter collections to form "an epistolary archive for posterity." This represented a shift from an earlier period when authors rarely preserved personal papers to an emerging society where writers' personal lives became "markers of authenticity in the expanded print market."

Richardson's letters were thus works of "authorial self-fashioning," carefully shaped documents that served as models for his fictional protagonists while simultaneously crafting his own public image. This self-aware approach to correspondence influenced how subsequent generations understood the relationship between private writing and public identity.

The Enduring Legacy

Samuel Richardson expanded "the dramatic possibilities of the novel" through his invention and sophisticated use of the letter form. Yet his influence extended beyond literature into the practical realm of everyday communication. By demonstrating that letters could capture psychological complexity, moral struggle, and lived experience with unprecedented depth, Richardson elevated correspondence from mere utility to an art form that shaped how the 18th century understood itself.

For Further Reading:

·         Britannica's biography of Samuel Richardson: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-Richardson

·         Academic analysis of Richardson's work: https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34622/chapter-abstract/294964746?redirectedFrom=fulltext

·         Study on Richardson and letter-writing: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364772338_Samuel_Richardson_and_the_Art_of_Letter-Writing

·         Cambridge University Press on Richardson's epistolary style: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811071/31514/frontmatter/9781107131514_frontmatter.pdf

Saturday, May 30, 2026

National Hole in My Bucket Day

On May 30th of each year, National Hole in My Bucket Day is observed. This wacky holiday is in honor of the fun children's song; There's a Hole in My Bucket.

The song which has its origins in 1700 Germany, is about a back and forth conversation between Henry and Liza.  Henry needs to fix his leaky bucket.  In each stanza, Henry asks Liza for advice. In the end, he needs a bucket to carry water to repair his bucket.

While this annual event was inspired by a song concerned with fixing a leaky bucket, there are other ways to celebrate this day. We all know it's a bit of a bummer when a once serviceable bucket gets a hole. But not all is lost. Holey buckets still serve a purpose. While they may no longer hold liquids (or hold them well), they do still maintain volumes of mass. Depending on where the hole is, it can do many jobs.

  • Buckets of many sizes make excellent planters, especially for garden vegetables that sow deep roots.
  • Fill it with concrete to hold a PVC pipe. Then you'll have a sturdy umbrella stand.
  • Make a garden seat for weeding the flower beds, and you'll have storage for your tools, too. It doesn't take a lot of skill to make a padded, covered seat out of the lid.
  • Create a compost bin. Even with a hole in it, you'll be able to make terrific, nutrient-rich compost for your garden.
  • Old galvanized buckets make excellent decor on the patio or in your home. Use them as light shades or side tables.
  • Build a birdhouse, bird feeder, bird or butterfly bath.
  • Storage, storage, storage. Buckets of all kinds can be dressed up and used to store tools, outdoor toys, and gear.

From <https://www.nationaldaycalendar.com/national-day/national-hole-in-my-bucket-day-may-30

 

So, sing the song while you repurpose your leaky bucket.

 

HOW TO OBSERVE HOLE IN MY BUCKET DAY

How many ways can you reuse a leaky bucket? 

 

1.  Show us how by using #HoleInMyBucketDay to post on social media. 

2.  Perhaps sing the song 



There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza,

There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, a hole.

 

        Then mend it, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        Then mend it, dear Henry, dear Henry, mend it.

 

With what shall I mend it, dear Liza, dear Liza?

With what shall I mend it, dear Liza, with what?

 

        With straw, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        With straw, dear Henry, dear Henry, with straw.

 

The straw is too long, dear Liza, dear Liza,

The straw is too long, dear Liza, too long.

 

        Then cut it, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        Then cut it, dear Henry, dear Henry, cut it.

 

With what shall I cut it, dear Liza, dear Liza?

With what shall I cut it, dear Liza, with what?

 

        With a knife, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        With a knife, dear Henry, dear Henry, a knife.

 

The knife is too dull, dear Liza, dear Liza,

The knife is too dull, dear Liza, too dull.

 

        Then sharpen it, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        Then sharpen it, dear Henry, dear Henry, sharpen it.

 

With what shall I sharpen it, dear Liza, dear Liza?

With what shall I sharpen it, dear Liza, with what?

 

        With a stone, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        With a stone, dear Henry, dear Henry, a stone.

 

The stone is too dry, dear Liza, dear Liza,

The stone is too dry, dear Liza, too dry.

 

        Then wet it, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        Then wet it, dear Henry, dear Henry, wet it.

 

With what shall I wet it, dear Liza, dear Liza?

With what shall I wet it, dear Liza, with what?

 

        With water, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        With water, dear Henry, dear Henry, with water.

 

In what shall I fetch it, dear Liza, dear Liza?

In what shall I fetch it, dear Liza, in what?

 

        In a bucket, dear Henry, dear Henry, dear Henry,

        In a bucket, dear Henry, dear Henry, in a bucket.

 

But there's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza,

There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, a hole. 

Sword Defense, Fencing, and the Art of the Blade in Colonial America

  Steel and Honor Sword Defense, Fencing, and the Art of the Blade in Colonial America and the American Revolutionary War Period (1620–1...